Wooster’s Team Utah 2020: Final Day in the Field (Alas)

Hurricane, Utah — Last night we made the sad decision to leave for home as soon as possible because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The College has mandated no more in-person teaching, and we don’t want our flight plans to be complicated by cancellations and other mass-transit issues. This is thus our last day in the field.

We started at our treasured oyster-ball locality in Manganese Wash just north of the Gunlock Reservoir (C/W-157; field code MW). This was a key site for Team Utah 2018, but we could not access it last year because the bridge over the Santa Clara River had washed out. The bridge is back so over it we went. This is now Juda’s second site for trace fossils in the upper part of the Co-op Creek Limestone Member of the Carmel Formation. As you can see in the image above with Dr. Judge, there is more brush and weathering at this location than at Eagle Mountain Ranch. This made the trace fossils less crisp in their preservation.

This diffuse set of traces is new to us. It seems to be a deposit-feeding swirl.

Herringbone cross-stratification in this location as well. The paleoenvironment is still shallow and normal marine.

While Juda, Dr. Judge and I worked in the upper Co-op Creek, Will and Nick climbed up a ridge and then down towards the Gunlock Reservoir to visit the lower Co-op Creek and its stromatolites. They again measured, described and collected the unit.

And that was it for our fieldwork! We shipped three heavy boxes of samples back to our Wooster lab. We met our field goals, despite the truncated schedule.

To celebrate, we had another round of Veyo pies and then visited Snow Canyon State Park north of St. George. The Jurassic Navajo Sandstone is weathered in three dimensions here, enabling us to scramble about on its “petrified dunes”. Such a beautiful mix of orange white and black rocks with the green plants and blue skies.

Needless to say, Juda and Will liked the place.

The Jurassic dunes here have deeply eroded foresets at sometimes surprisingly steep angles.

Team Utah 2020! Plus Nick, who took this image. Such a fine crew in skills and enthusiasm.

(Links to the First Day, Second Day, and Third Day.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Wooster’s Team Utah 2020: On a Jurassic Tidal Flat

Hurricane, Utah — Our second day was devoted to measuring, describing and sampling Will’s stromatolite-bearing rocks in the lower half of the Co-op Creek Limestone Member of the Carmel Formation. This locality is only a couple of hundred meters west of Juda’s study location yesterday. The rocks are very different: lime mudstones with beautiful markers for their tidal flat origins. We worked in a deep wadi and thus had cliff sections with some bedding plane exposures. Above the team is describing the top of a depositional cycle. (I don’t know why Nick is giving me the side-eye!)

These are bedding-plane exposures of the top of a laterally-linked hemispheroids stromatolite unit.

Just above the previous stromatolites are these desiccation cracks. The tiny pockmarks may be raindrop imprints. The mudcracked units are thick enough in some places to make unusual sedimentary columnar bedding.

These are casts of evaporative gypsum or anhydrite nodules.

An intraclastic limestone grading into a breccia was one of our marker horizons. These rocks are often referred to as “evaporative breccias” because they are associated with the dissolution of evaporite mineral layers and collapse of the mudstones above.

These are delicious columnar stromatolites that made mounds on the sediment surface. The stromatolites are like thick fingers reaching upwards.

This close view shows the packing of the stromatolites. It is almost hexagonal.

An even closer view shows that the stromatolites were burrowed while still relatively soft. Were the trace-makers feeding on the decaying cyanobacterial mats inside? The interstitial sediment in the burrows and between the columns appears to be dolomitized.

Can’t have tidal sediments without herringbone cross-stratification, can we? These structures indicate bidirectional currents, likely from storms or tides.

Lunch in the shade! We had much more sun than yesterday.

Another successful day of field geology. We celebrated at the Veyo pie shop, now a Wooster Utah tradition.

(Links to the First Day, Second Day, and Third Day.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Wooster’s Team Utah 2020: Field Geology in a Time of Plague

Hurricane, Utah — This is Team Utah 2020 at Gunlock Reservoir in the far southwestern corner of beautiful Utah. Starting on the left is Juda Culp (’21), Will Santella (’21), Dr. Shelley Judge (our ace structural geologist and tectonicist), and Nick Wiesenberg (our invaluable geological technician). The dipping exposure in the background is the Carmel Formation, a Middle Jurassic (about 170 million-year-old) unit with wonderfully diverse sedimentary rocks and fossils. It is why we are here.

The Carmel has been one of my favorite formations since the early 1990s. I’ve been bringing students and colleagues to study it for many years, the most recent being Team Utah 2019 and Team Utah 2018. This unit has enough variability and mystery for a dozen future teams.

We are again pursuing the Independent Study projects of Wooster students with this field trip. Juda is studying the Carmel trace fossils in a paleoenvironmental context, and Will is examining a series of stromatolites preserved in the lower part of the Carmel.

As you will see, the students were very successful with their fieldwork, but we had to go back to Ohio early because of the COVID-19 pandemic producing travel and health complications. We left Wooster on Monday, March 9, into a risky but predictable world. By Thursday, March 12, it was clear we needed to get back home. We had three days of fieldwork. Juda and Will adapted immediately to the geology and the gorgeous landscapes, so they were disappointed to leave. We accomplished all our measuring and sampling goals, though.

Now the good parts! The images in the following posts were taken by Shelley, Nick and me.

Today we worked on Juda’s project at the productive Eagle Mountain Ranch locality (C/W-142 EMR). Thank you again to the Smith family for giving us access to their land. The thick conglomerate at the top of the section is the Middle Cretaceous Iron Springs Formation. It rests unconformably on the Middle Jurassic Co-op Creek Limestone Member of the Carmel Formation. We spent all our time in the Co-op Creek Limestone Member, which is informally divided into an upper unit (buff-colored; Juda’s rocks) and lower unit (light gray; Will’s rocks). Our prime targets are the loose slabs eroded from meter-thick oolitic limestones. They often have fantastic trace fossils.

Above is a typical slab collected by Juda for its trace fossils. These are burrow-fillings on the bottom of the bed, formally preserved as convex hyporelief.

Every day starts with a field briefing and exchange of initial observations.

Juda hard at work on the steep slope. The skies are cloudy, with temperatures pleasantly in the 50s. Behind Juda’s head are the light-colored rocks Will is studying.

Will collecting trace fossils for Juda. The slabs are weathered just right to show the fossils in crisp relief.

Team Utah 2020 celebrating a successful first field day.

There was just enough time left in the day to visit the St. George Dinosaur Discovery Site.

This museum is always cool, but it was especially relevant today because it is all about trace fossils! We visit every year we’re in town. Dinosaur trackways are the primary subject — most of them in place.

The students were fascinated, especially since they could now consider themselves ichnologists (trace fossil experts).

After our museum visit we had a delicious barbecue dinner and then went back home to our Hurricane lodgings with our samples and observations.

(Links to the First Day, Second Day, and Third Day.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Petroleum Experts Ltd. Donates MOVE Suite to Wooster Once Again!!

Wooster, Ohio — The Department of Earth Sciences is pleased to announce that Petroleum Experts Ltd. recently donated ten licenses of their MOVE suite software package to be used for educational and training purposes.  This is the second year in which Petroleum Experts Ltd. has generously donated 10 licenses of the MOVE suite to the College.  The MOVE suite currently has a market value of $2.54 million (US$), and it is accessed through a hardware based software protection device (a bitlock by Petex’s Network Licensing Manager, HARDLOCK).

The MOVE suite is the global industry standard for structural modelling, and its software modules include 2D/3D kinematic modelling, geomechanical modelling, sediment modelling, fracture modelling, fault analysis, and stress analysis, to name a few.  When using the MOVE suite, Wooster faculty and students will be able to interpret data, build cross-sections, and kinematically and dynamically analyze structural histories.  More information about Petroleum Experts Ltd. and the MOVE suite can be found at http://www.petex.com/products/move-suite/.

Petroleum Experts Ltd. is based in Edinburgh, Scotland, with a satellite office in Houston, Texas.  The Department of Earth Sciences is appreciative for the diligent team effort at Petroleum Experts Ltd. that worked to make this current year’s donation possible.  We are also grateful for the conscientious work of numerous colleagues at the College (Vince DiScipio, Ellen Falduto, Lisa Perfetti), especially those in Technology Services who install and upkeep the MOVE suite.

During the upcoming calendar year, our faculty and students will benefit enormously from using the integrative MOVE suite; those students enrolled in the following courses will have access to class modules that require MOVE modelling capabilities: ESCI 340 (Structural Geology), ESCI 345 (Tectonics and Basin Analysis), and ESCI 401/451/452 (Independent Study).

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

New Paper: Synoptic Climatology of Rain-on-Snow Events in Alaska

Back in 2018, some internal sophomore research funding through the College of Wooster allowed me to hire Anna Cooke (’20) to begin an investigation into rain-on-snow events in Alaska. Rain-on-snow is exactly what it sounds like: rain falling on top of snow.  We see this fairly often in Ohio in winter, and our biggest problem with rain-on-snow is usually that all of that rain melts the snow packs. This makes flooding more likely because it’s not just the rain falling that raises river levels — it’s also the melting snow.

Figure 1: Alaskan caribou (photo credit: Alex Crawford)

But in Arctic environments, rain-on-snow can have a more insidious impact. If, instead of melting the snowpack, the rain trickles through the snow and cools down to the point of freezing, it will form lenses of ice at the base of the snow. That ice impedes that ability of animals like caribou (Figure 1) to access lichens on the ground below.  Digging through snow is easy, but breaking through ice is energy-intensify at best and impossible at worse. Several examples of rain-on-snow followed by freezing and mass die-offs have been recorded in AlaskaCanada, Svalbard, Russia, and most recently Finland.

Figure 2: Counts per year for various precipitation events in Alaska from the MERRA-2 atmospheric reanalysis (1980-2018).

In a new paper just published in final form at Monthly Weather Review, we built on the work that Anna began as a sophomore researcher by applying a storm detection and tracking algorithm that I developed for my PhD and connecting rain-on-snow events at particular locations to the storms that generated them. This allowed us to answer questions that had never been addressed before, especially: Is there anything special about storms that produce rain-on-snow?  Are they more intense than other storms?  Are they generated in different ways? Do they take distinct paths? Answering such questions can better help us understand and predict these events, which sometimes have dire consequences for caribou/reindeer, musk oxen, and the people who rely on them. Dr. Karen Alley here at the College of Wooster and Dr. Mark Serreze at the University of Colorado Boulder helped out in the planning, interpretation, and writing of this project.

Figure 3: Distribution of storm tracks leading to (left) rain-on-snow and (center) only snow-on-snow in winter months at Bethel, Alaska. The right-hand plot shows where rain-on-snow-producing storms are more common (in red, e.g., the Bering Sea) and where snow-on-snow-producing storms are more common (in blue, e.g., the Gulf of Alaska). A statistical simulation for the region outlined in purple showed that two observed samples of storm tracks have more distinct spatial patterns than 1000 out of 1000 (i.e., 100%) of randomly assigned samples.

The most important finding of our research is this: For most of Alaska (the south, southwest, and interior regions) storms that generate rain-on-snow generally take different paths than other storms, tracking much more often into the Bering Sea than the Gulf of Alaska (Figure 3). Such a storm track places Alaska in what’s called the “warm sector” of a storm, where winds are blowing from the south, bringing more warm, moist air poleward. We also found that storms tend to track into the Bering Sea instead of the Gulf of Alaska when “atmospheric blocking” takes place (Figure 4). We see atmospheric blocking in the lower 48, too: whenever a storm stalls out, not moving, and there’s a big blue H (i.e.,  a high-pressure center) sitting to the east of the storm, that’s an indication of atmospheric blocking. (They’re sometimes called “blocking highs” for that reason.) Why is that important? Well, there’s been a lot of talk about whether atmospheric blocking will become more common in a warming world.  That’s still uncertain, it seems, but it’s something atmospheric scientists will continue to monitor.

Figure 4: Detrended sea-level pressure anomalies (colored shading) and upper-level atmospheric height anomalies (contours) for (right) rain-on-snow events and (center) only snow-on-snow events and (right) their difference. The darker purple in the left-hand plot indicates that rain-on-snow events are accompanied by strong atmospheric blocking. This blocking forces storms north into the Bering Sea and (eventually) the Arctic Ocean. The lighter purple in the center plot shows weaker high pressure and no tendency for blocking. In these situations, storms can plow on through toward the Gulf of Alaska.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

New paper: “Chemical composition of carbonate hardground cements as reconstructive tools for Phanerozoic pore fluids”

My friend Paul Taylor and I are junior authors on a paper that has just appeared in the journal Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems (“G-Cubed”) as an in press accepted manuscript. We’ll be the first to admit that it is a bit outside our comfort zone in geology, but our contributions, along with those of the other authors, are a good example of interdisciplinary team work. We were led by Dr. Andrea Erhardt at the University of Kentucky. This project took about four years from first draft to published article. Here is the abstract —

This study uses the chemical composition of early carbonate cement precipitates in carbonate hardgrounds to understand the geochemical signature of near-surface carbonate mineral precipitation. As carbonate hardgrounds lithify at or near the sediment-water interface, they acquire cements that may be minimally evolved from paleo-seawater. While hardgrounds can be subaerially exposed during sea-level regression, geochemical changes from interactions with meteoric water can leave a distinct geochemical signature. Using a suite of chemical measurements, we explore the potential of carbonate hardground cements as paleoenvironmental proxies. Trace metal and isotopic ratios, including rare earth elements, Mg/Ca, manganese and strontium concentrations, d18O, d13C, and 87Sr/86Sr, were analyzed in the carbonate cements from 17 Phanerozoic carbonate hardgrounds. Of these samples, only our sample from the modern oceans has measurements consistent with primary precipitation from seawater; all other samples precipitated from chemically evolved seawater or were influenced by meteoric water, even if only minimally changed. While the more recent Cenozoic samples had seawater 87Sr/86Sr, the Mesozoic samples, in contrast, did not preserve seawater 87Sr/86Sr, even though the Mg/Ca, d18O, and d13C values were consistent with precipitation from seawater. Finally, the Paleozoic samples preserved expected seawater 87Sr/86Sr, though REE and d18O suggest primary precipitation was from evolved seawater. Additionally, we place our results in the context of open vs. closed system precipitation using transects of the Mg/Ca ratios across individual cements. Overall, we stress that one proxy provides only a partial record of fluid composition, but multiple measurements allow a potential understanding of the seawater geochemical signal. [Sorry that I couldn’t figure out how to include superscripts and Greek letters!]

Fortunately this journal requires a Plain Language Summary —

All potential archives for reconstructing ancient seawater chemistry have complicating factors, be it biological modification or secondary alteration. This study investigates a promising alternative, carbonate hardground cements. As carbonate hardgrounds form relatively quickly and in equilibrium with seawater, if a sample has remained unaltered it should retain the primary seawater chemistry. We evaluate 17 samples from across the Phanerozoic, compiling trace element concentrations and isotopic ratios to determine if a sample has undergone significant diagenesis. Overall, no ancient sample satisfies all criteria, but the suite of measurements allows for an evaluation framework for future samples.

Hardgrounds are synsedimentarily-cemented seafloor. In other words, sediments that have essentially lithified into rock on the seafloor. The top image is of an echinoderm-encrusted Ordovician carbonate hardground from the Kanosh Formation of west-central Utah, which was included in this study. I’ve loved hardgrounds for decades now, learning much from my friend, the master of hardgrounds, Tim Palmer of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth. You can see in the first sentence of the discussion in this paper the primary role Paul Taylor and I played: “Our samples were selected based on evidence of early lithification at the sediment/water interface through the presence of marine boring and encrusting organisms.” That early lithification is with calcite cement generated from seawater in some form, thus the possibility that these hardgrounds are archiving ancient seawater composition. Seawater composition, of course, tells us much about marine paleoenvironments.

Figure 4 caption: “Mg/Ca ratios, strontium concentrations, and Mn/Sr ratios for samples showing examples of A) closed and B) open system precipitation behavior. Samples from potential closed system environments show an increase in Mg/Ca ratios along the growth axis, while samples from open systems show uniform Mg/Ca ratios. Strontium concentrations and Mn/Sr ratios can be indicators of diagenetic alteration, with thresholds of less than 300ppm for strontium and Mn/Sr ratios greater than 2 consistent with carbonate recrystallization under chemically evolved pore waters. The red lines indicate the trace of the LA-ICPMS.”

One aspect of this project I appreciate very much: The results are fuzzier than we expected. No single geochemical proxy shows a full record of the composition of the original cementing fluids. It is the combination of proxies that gives us the best clues, which is an incremental move towards better understanding of ancient seawater geochemistry. It is nice to see such data, observations and ideas published without a tight evidentiary ribbon around it all. Science in progress!

Reference:

Erhardt, A.M., Alexandra V. Turchyn, A.V., Dickson, J.A.D., Sadekov, A.Y., Taylor, P.D., Wilson, M.A. and Schrag, D.P. 2020. Chemical composition of carbonate hardground cements as reconstructive tools for Phanerozoic pore fluids. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems (in press; accepted manuscript online; https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008448).

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Posts from Antarctica: The Season in Numbers

Greetings from McMurdo once again! After many delays and a lot of worry about whether we’d have time to complete our science goals, we have returned with lots of great data and plans for future work. If the weather holds, I’ll leave for Christchurch tomorrow on my way back home. I’m hopeful that in the coming weeks I’ll be able to write a few more blog posts about the science we did, but for now I thought I’d give you a quick summary of the season in numbers.

The TARSAN field team at Cavity Camp

11: Number of members of our TARSAN field team

In the photo above, from left to right: Doug Fox (science writer), Christian Wild (post-doc with Erin at Oregon State), me, Erin Pettit (lead PI, Oregon State), Ted Scambos (University of Colorado Boulder), Martin Truffer (University of Alaska Fairbanks), Cece Mortenson (field guide), Atsu Muto (Temple University), Dale Pomraning (University of Alaska Fairbanks), Bruce Wallin (University of Colorado Boulder), and Blair Fyffe (field guide).

Erin super excited to be getting on an LC-130 bound for WAIS Divide

20: Number of days I waited for delayed planes

I waited 13 days in McMurdo beyond our scheduled departure date (and my team members arrived a week earlier, so they waited about 20 days) and 7 days at the field camp at WAIS Divide (some of our team members managed to slide right through without a long layover at WAIS Divide). My fingers are crossed that I won’t add additional days to that number while waiting to leave for Christchurch!

A beautiful night at Cavity Camp

3: Number of camp locations

The entire team started at Cavity Camp on the eastern ice shelf of Thwaites Glacier. After about 2.5 weeks there, six of us flew to the Dotson Ice Shelf, while the remaining members traversed a few kilometers to camp over a basal channel carved into the underside of the ice shelf.

Dale (background) and Martin (foreground) drilling at Cavity Camp

2: Number of holes drilled through the Thwaites Ice Shelf

Although we had originally hoped to drill on both Thwaites and Dotson, logistical challenges limited the drilling to Thwaites. Martin and Dale drilled holes through 300 meters of ice at Cavity Camp and 249 meters at Channel Camp. Ted and Bruce installed instruments in the ocean beneath and on a tower above the holes, which will continue to transmit data back to us.

Erin, Martin, Bruce, and Ted installing ocean instruments in the first borehole

1: Number of squids we saw on the borehole camera

I don’t have a picture to share, but there was indeed a squid that checked out the camera, shot ink at it, and swam away.

A really spectacular view of the Thwaites Glacier calving front

80: Number of minutes on the plane between Thwaites and Dotson

Our pilot, Troy, took us along the calving front of Thwaites Glacier and up the Crosson Ice Shelf, giving us some of the most spectacular views I’ve ever seen.

Atsu lowering explosives into a borehole for active seismic data collection

64: Number of active seismic data points Atsu and I collected

We measured seismic reflections at 37 sites on Thwaites and 27 on Dotson. Each site took about an hour and a half, give or take.

Me working on sewing up the cook tent during the storm

8: Approximate number of feet of ripped tent we had to sew back together during a storm

When the rain fly on our cook tent ripped during a storm, we spent about three hours working as a team to sew it back together in winds gusting to 40 knots.

Christian making a phase-sensitive radar measurement

63: Number of repeat phase-sensitive radar measurements Christian made

He measured 46 sites on Thwaites and 17 on Dotson. He had to visit each site twice and measure precisely in the same location to get an estimate of ice-thickness change.

Christian with a permanent phase-sensitive radar installation on Dotson (Mt. Murphy in the background)

4: Number of long-term phase-sensitive radar installations

We left two phase-sensitive radars on Thwaites and two on Dotson to send data back that will tell us a lot about ice flow and basal melt rates.

Erin setting off for the day, towing her radar setup

270: Approximate number of kilometers Erin walked while dragging the radar behind her.

The radar has to be moved slowly and steadily across the ice-shelf surface, so Erin got plenty of exercise this season. I pitched in and did 14 km one day, and I can tell you that dragging that radar system is no joke!

Cece during a long day on the snowmobile

9: Number of ways Christian can whistle

These are the kinds of things you think about during a long day on a snowmobile.

Digging out snow blocks to build wind walls

6,408,795: Approximate number of shovelfuls of snow we moved during the season

Okay, that number might not be very accurate. But polar fieldwork really is mostly just shoveling.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Anatomy of a Record High

Like several towns and cities in the midwest and northeast USA, Wooster, OH broke its daily high temperature record for January 11 last Saturday. Below is a graph of some of the data (made a little prettier in powerpoint) from the weather station I run at my house.

The outdoor air temperature is the black curve, and the two vertical shaded regions show a period of rapid warming (red) midday Thursday and a period of rapid cooling (blue) on Sunday morning. I’m about to teach a unit about weather and climate to start this semester in ESCI 275, and this weekend was a great example of how an extratropical cyclone (a.k.a. a “winter storm”) can impact the temperature you feel outside.  There wasn’t much rain in this storm, but the winds and temperatures show the impact. Courtesy of the Weather Channel, here’s what the situation looked like Thursday:



See that big red “L” on the border of Nebraska and Iowa? That’s what’s responsible for the crazy swing in temperatures.  The red line extending east from it represents a warm front — south of that front, the air was much warmer than north of that front. The white contours are isobars (lines of constant pressure), and those show that behind that warm front, southerly winds were bringing warm air northward. The arrows on the graph at the top show the same thing. If you’d watched a flag flapping in the wind all morning Thursday, you’d watch it twist around from the turning — northerly wind then easterly wind then southerly wind by midday.  The temperature rose by more than 20°F over a few hours Thursday as that warm front passed over Ohio.

Anybody who looks at weather maps obsessively knows that behind most red warm fronts is a blue cold front; and a cold front was beginning to form with this Low (a.k.a. cyclone (a.k.a. storm)), extending from Nebraska to Texas…. it was just delayed. By noon Friday, the Low in Nebraska shot all the way up to Canada, moving around that big area of stalwart high pressure (the blue “H”) to its east. (That’s often called a “blocking high”, by the way.)  The cold front extending from the Low on this second map is not a pure cold front, either.  Notice the alternating red and blue from Michigan down to Oklahoma? That’s a sign that this front was actually “stationary” — it wasn’t moving. This stalling of the front led to a delay in the cooling down part of an extratropical cyclone, so places like Wooster and Pittsburgh continued to see southerly winds all day Friday and most of Saturday. This led to a few oddities: 1) The daily high on Thursday was at 11:59 PM. 2) The daily high on Friday was also 11:59 P. 3) The temperature on Saturday peaked at a whopping 67.6°F at 2:15 PM local time in Wooster. That’s like May weather in January.

The fun did not last forever, though. The stalled section of the cold front re-formed a secondary Low, and by late Saturday, the cold front was on the move over the USA again. This last map is from 10:15 PM Saturday night, less than two hours before that secondary Low passed almost directly over Wooster. Temperatures dropped almost 30°F overnight, and Sunday felt a little more like winter.

That 67.6°F wasn’t just warm, by the way; it was higher than any temperature ever recorded on a January 11at the OARDC station in Wooster from 1900 to 2019. This last graph shows the same temperature curve as before, but it also shows box plots for the daily high temperature 1900-2019 for each day January 9 through January 13. A normal highest temperature of the day is between about 22°F and 42°F for this four-day period. (The red boxes show the “interquartile range”, meaning that the coldest 30 years are below the red box, the middle 60 years are inside the red box, and the warmest 30 years are above the red box.) That 67.6°F would have been a record for any of these four days. (The “whisker” ends show the maximum and minimum.) Moreover, those box plots are showing the daily high, not the average temperature for the whole day… so the fact that even Sunday remained above the median daily high the entire day when it’s the cold day is a further sign of how impressive that warm snap was.


And again, this happened because a Low pressure system started moving east, got stuck, and reformed into two separate lows — first a Canadian Low, then a Michigan Low. While it stalled and reformed, southerly winds kept pumping warmth into Ohio, and that’s what set the record on Saturday — we had nearly 60 hours of consistent southerly winds.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Posts from Antarctica: Logistics Update and Local History

Hello to you all from… still McMurdo. While we’re all frustrated to still be playing the waiting game, a ray of hope appeared last night – a plane flew from McMurdo to WAIS Divide, for the first time in over two weeks! Furthermore, three planes (a Basler and two Twin Otters, in case you’re interested in planes) are en route with cargo today from WAIS Divide, with destinations at Lower Thwaites Glacier (a staging site for gear headed to the science camps), Cavity Camp (our first destination) and Grounding Zone (the first camp for the MELT team). In fact, we just found out that the Basler successfully made the first landing at Cavity Camp, and has brought a whole bunch of our cargo – Ted and Erin literally both just did cartwheels in celebration.

Unfortunately, the delays, along with some aircraft maintenance issues, mean that we’re not going to achieve all of our original science goals, at least this season. But with the latest big gains, we should still be able to get a whole lot of good science done. It’s possible I could now be leaving for the deep field as early as Friday (fingers crossed!), so I wanted to make sure to slip in one more blog post for you all before I go.

Locations of historic huts on Ross Island, from https://www.coolantarctica.com/schools/Antarctica-maps-ross-island.php.

A few years ago I got into reading many of the great polar exploration stories of the early 1900s. If you’re interested in some great reading, start with Alfred Lansing’s “Endurance” about Ernest Shackleton’s failed attempt to cross Antarctica between 1914 and 1917. Another brilliant classic, this time a first-person account, is Apsley Cherry-Garrard’s “Worst Journey in the World” about Scott’s 1910-1913 Discovery Expedition to the South Pole. And if you want to come closer to understanding the true depths that a human being can suffer, Lennard Bickel’s “Mawson’s Will,” about an ill-fated expedition to map the Antarctic coastline south of Australia, will give you a new appreciation for what early polar explorers have endured.

 

A view of Hut Point from behind my dorm, with the Discovery Hut in the foreground and Vince’s Cross near the tip of the point behind the hut.

Since I have some knowledge of these epic exploration stories, and some personal experience with icy locales, one of the most exciting aspects of McMurdo for me is the nearby historical sites. Ross Island has played host to many historic expeditions, which left three huts that still stand along the shoreline. Scott’s Discovery Expedition built the first hut at Hut Point in 1902.The Nimrod Expedition, the first expedition Shackleton led to the Antarctica, left a hut at Cape Royds in 1908. And Scott’s 1910-1913 Terra Nova expedition left a hut at Cape Evans. Unfortunately, with the thin sea ice this year, we won’t get to visit the huts at Cape Royds or Cape Evans, but Hut Point is visible from my dorm building and is just a few minutes’ walk down the road. You can’t go in on your own, but we arranged a tour for our whole team last week.

 

The Discovery Hut with McMurdo in the background.

Captain Robert Falcon Scott’s Discovery Expedition (1901-1904) was primarily focused on mapping and carrying out scientific research. It included many men who played key roles in later expeditions, such as Ernest Shackleton, and made many important discoveries, including finding the Dry Valleys (the only ice-free valleys in Antarctica).

Crates piled inside the Discovery Hut.

They also learned a thing or two about huts. The hut they put up at Hut Point was a pre-fabricated hut that was actually designed for the Australian Outback. As Australia is known for heat, not cold, the hut was designed to be shady, cool, and well-ventilated. As you might imagine, that’s not ideal for Antarctica. The men found the hut to be cold and uncomfortable, and chose to mostly live and work aboard their ship (the Discovery). The hut was used primarily for storage, as well as for some cooking and science.

 

A box from Scott’s 1910 Antarctic Expedition.

Despite its drafty interior, it was still a valuable shelter and equipment cache for later expeditions. Shackleton’s Nimrod expedition used the hut briefly in 1909, on their way back from an attempt to reach the pole. Scott’s 1910-1913 Terra Nova expedition used the hut (which was farther south than their hut at Cape Evans, making it a good jumping-off point for south-going parties) fairly extensively. The last people to use the hut were the Ross Sea Party of Shackleton’s Imperial Transantarctic Expedition, who left in 1916. It then lay untouched (and full of snow and ice), until it was dug out in 1956, the year McMurdo was founded.

The kitchen area inside the Discovery Hut.

The hut remains well-preserved today. I walked over to see the hut on my own not long after I arrived. I was engrossed in reading the sign on the door (which just indicates rules for entry), and suddenly jumped when I realized I was standing right next to a dead, decaying seal dating from 1916. When we got to go inside the hut, we found a high-ceilinged, open interior that had been curtained off into a main storage/living area and a kitchen area. There’s also one separate room, which was used primarily for carrying out scientific experiments and analysis. Artifacts inside are very well-preserved (other than a slowly decaying pile of seal blubber), and have been arranged for better viewing. There are crates, bags, and shovels from the expeditions, old tin cans and tools, and even some pieces of the biscuit that was a staple of their diet (I wouldn’t try eating it now!). You can faintly see on the walls where many of the men wrote their names.

Tools and supplies inside the Discovery Hut.

Just up the hill from the hut, out on the end of the point, is a cross that was erected in 1902 in memory of a Discovery crewmember who drowned near that spot.

 

The cross the Discovery Expedition erected at the tip of Hut Point in memory of George Vince.

Although the Discovery Hut is perhaps the most interesting historical site in the immediate vicinity of McMurdo, Scott’s 1910-1913 Terra Nova Expedition is much more famous. After several expeditions had made attempts, Scott was determined that a British man would be the first to stand on the South Pole. They made extensive depot arrangements and used a variety of techniques to get there, including ponies, man-hauling, and some experimentation with the earliest motor sledges. Five men from Scott’s expedition reached the pole on January 17th, 1912, only to find that the Norwegian Roald Amundsen had beaten them by just five weeks (incidentally, Amundsen is arguably also the first to reach the North Pole, as earlier claims are disputed, and he led the first expedition through the northwest passage). Still more tragically, Scott’s team never made it back; one of the men died on the march, one walked into a storm to sacrifice himself as he knew he was dying and was holding back the team, and the final three, Scott included, died in a blizzard in their tent, just 11 miles from a major supply depot.

The cross the Terra Nova Expedition erected at the top of Ob Hill in memory of the five men who lost their lives on the way home from the South Pole.

Before heading home, the remaining members of Scott’s expedition erected a cross at the top of Observation Hill to honor the lost pole party. They inscribed it with the names of the lost and a line from Tennyson’s Ulysses: “To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.” The inscriptions have all but worn away by now (you can still see faint impressions if you look closely), but the cross still overlooks McMurdo.

Biscuit left by one of the expeditions at the Discovery Hut.

Having spent a little time in the middle of the Greenland Ice Sheet, and being about to head out to West Antarctica, I can’t imagine the bravery and outright craziness it must have taken for early explorers and researchers to achieve what they did. I’ll be sleeping in a fluffy synthetic sleeping bag on two insulating pads; they had reindeer fur sleeping bags that sometimes began to rot partway into the expedition. We have high-calorie, high-protein, and mostly good-tasting meals and snacks, including a whole lot of chocolate; they survived on biscuit, pemmican (basically powdered meat mixed with fat and sometimes other ingredients), and often their dead sled-dogs. We’ll be back to the comforts of home in just a couple months, and in the meantime have several forms of communication with McMurdo and with home; they went away for several years with hardly any communication at all during that time. We may be facing a harsh environment in the field, but it’s a heck of a lot easier to face than it was 100 years ago!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

A course in nonsense

For many years I’ve offered a First-Year Seminar at Wooster entitled, “Nonsense! (And Why It’s So Popular)”. Today we finished the latest version of the course. The semester went so well I want to celebrate. The class of first-year students above (with our excellent Teaching Assistant Malik holding the book on the left) was enthusiastic, knowledgeable and creative. They all participated in the discussions and have the record of 100% of written assignments turned in on time. And they did all this work in a class that started at 8:00 am! The Nonsense course website has all the academic details.

Here is our course description and rationale: “A deep streak of irrationality runs through humanity, especially in these days of “post-truth” and “fake news”. Belief that the Earth is flat has increased dramatically among American young people, and a curious conspiracy theory centered on the mysterious “Q-Anon” alleges dramatic secret battles between the “Deep State” and a satanic cabal for control of the US government. Horrific mass shootings are dismissed as “false flags” employing “crisis actors” for obscure political gains. Anti-vaccination groups have triggered new outbreaks of diseases we thought were nearly extinct, and quack medical “cures” are as popular as ever. Why is such nonsense so common when information has never been easier to access? What are the dangers to society when irrationality is common? Do we have logical tools to sort bad ideas from good? In this seminar we will examine conspiracy theories, crank science, revisionist history, and other topics from the edges of reason. We will use original literature, websites, and films to explore the lure of these ideas and their social origins. Our primary textbook will be The Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe: How to Know What’s Really Real in a World Increasingly Full of Fake. Our course objective is to improve our own critical thinking, writing and speaking … and, in the words of the late Carl Sagan, to light a candle in a demon-haunted world.”

This book by the Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe team was a superb resource throughout the semester. I highly recommend it to any readers.

Obviously there is plenty of nonsense these days to keep a class busy. Our academic goal was to develop critical thinking, writing and speaking skills by sharpening them against the waves of irrationality around us. We also found that learning the history of an idea was where to start understanding its attraction and tenacity. The students will tell you that our studies of the Flat Earth stream of nonsense were the most frustrating — and illuminating. Fake News was the most irritating was the most irritating, and Holocaust Denial the most upsetting. Of course, every week of this semester had plenty of news about conspiracy theories. Above is an image of the class on a typical day. Note the name placards for each student. We used these not just to learn names, but also to keep the seating arrangements fluid through the semester.

Each student wrote a research paper on a particular area of pseudoscience or conspiracy theory, and then gave a presentation to the class, as Blakely is doing above. Every assignment provided tools and skills for this capstone experience, including writing essays, constructing annotated bibliographies, and giving short oral reports. This class came through with the best research papers I’ve seen at this level.

Teaching this class was an academic dream because the students were so responsive and responsible. Malik was the ideal Teaching Assistant because of his incisive intellect (he’s a philosophy and psychology double major), communication skills, and passion for teaching. He was an excellent role model for these beginning students.

This was an exciting course to teach because of the new material and challenges ever week. We live in an age of unprecedented nonsense, but I like to think that small groups of rational citizens like these students are beginning to make a difference.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment