<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary yet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/08/10/the-best-cretaceous-paleogene-boundary-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/08/10/the-best-cretaceous-paleogene-boundary-yet/</link>
	<description>A World to Explore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wooster Geologists &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geology and art meet with a ceramic creation from the Cretaceous extinctions</title>
		<link>http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/08/10/the-best-cretaceous-paleogene-boundary-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-7289</link>
		<dc:creator>Wooster Geologists &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geology and art meet with a ceramic creation from the Cretaceous extinctions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/?p=2341#comment-7289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] August 2010 I had a fantastic geologic field trip to the tunnels of Geulhemmmerberg, The Netherlands, to see an unusual exposure of the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. There I [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] August 2010 I had a fantastic geologic field trip to the tunnels of Geulhemmmerberg, The Netherlands, to see an unusual exposure of the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. There I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Mechanisms of Organic Change: Evolution (September 6-10) History of Life course at The College of Wooster</title>
		<link>http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/08/10/the-best-cretaceous-paleogene-boundary-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-4869</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Mechanisms of Organic Change: Evolution (September 6-10) History of Life course at The College of Wooster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/?p=2341#comment-4869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Cretaceous Extinction scenario is getting more complicated. It used to be simple: big rock from space killed the dinosaurs (and others) by creating an ecological catastrophe with a sun-blocking dust cloud, a rapid drop in temperatures, local firestorms, etc. As with all hypotheses, the more information we gather the more interesting the problem becomes. Now there is the suggestion there may have been two impacts. The Boltysh Crater in Ukraine is now paired with the better known (and much larger) Chicxulub Crater in Mexico. The implication is that there may have been more than just two impacts. This summer I was introduced to this new idea by a curious set of clays at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary in The Netherlands. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Cretaceous Extinction scenario is getting more complicated. It used to be simple: big rock from space killed the dinosaurs (and others) by creating an ecological catastrophe with a sun-blocking dust cloud, a rapid drop in temperatures, local firestorms, etc. As with all hypotheses, the more information we gather the more interesting the problem becomes. Now there is the suggestion there may have been two impacts. The Boltysh Crater in Ukraine is now paired with the better known (and much larger) Chicxulub Crater in Mexico. The implication is that there may have been more than just two impacts. This summer I was introduced to this new idea by a curious set of clays at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary in The Netherlands. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Paleoecology; The Kingdom of the Single-Celled Eucaryotes &#8212; Protista (September 7 &#38; 9) Invertebrate Paleontology at Wooster</title>
		<link>http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/08/10/the-best-cretaceous-paleogene-boundary-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-4868</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Paleoecology; The Kingdom of the Single-Celled Eucaryotes &#8212; Protista (September 7 &#38; 9) Invertebrate Paleontology at Wooster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/?p=2341#comment-4868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Cretaceous Extinction scenario is getting more complicated. It used to be simple: big rock from space killed the dinosaurs (and others) by creating an ecological catastrophe with a sun-blocking dust cloud, a rapid drop in temperatures, local firestorms, etc. As with all hypotheses, the more information we gather the more interesting the problem becomes. Now there is the suggestion there may have been two impacts. The Boltysh Crater in Ukraine is now paired with the better known (and much larger) Chicxulub Crater in Mexico. The implication is that there may have been more than just two impacts. This summer I was introduced to this new idea by a curious set of clays at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary in The Netherlands. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Cretaceous Extinction scenario is getting more complicated. It used to be simple: big rock from space killed the dinosaurs (and others) by creating an ecological catastrophe with a sun-blocking dust cloud, a rapid drop in temperatures, local firestorms, etc. As with all hypotheses, the more information we gather the more interesting the problem becomes. Now there is the suggestion there may have been two impacts. The Boltysh Crater in Ukraine is now paired with the better known (and much larger) Chicxulub Crater in Mexico. The implication is that there may have been more than just two impacts. This summer I was introduced to this new idea by a curious set of clays at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary in The Netherlands. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuff we linked to on Twitter last week &#124;</title>
		<link>http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/08/10/the-best-cretaceous-paleogene-boundary-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-4805</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuff we linked to on Twitter last week &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/?p=2341#comment-4805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] best Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary yet &#8211; in a cave, in the Netherlands. Awesome. http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/08/10/the-best-cretaceous-paleogene-boundary-yet... (via [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] best Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary yet &#8211; in a cave, in the Netherlands. Awesome. <a href="http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/08/10/the-best-cretaceous-paleogene-boundary-yet" rel="nofollow">http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/08/10/the-best-cretaceous-paleogene-boundary-yet</a>&#8230; (via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
