http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/05/22/post-cretaceous-weirdness/ A World to Explore Thu, 23 May 2013 20:20:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/05/22/post-cretaceous-weirdness/comment-page-1/#comment-4542 Mark Wilson Sun, 23 May 2010 10:03:05 +0000 http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/?p=1641#comment-4542 Yes indeed, Josh, that would be the non-romantic view of the stratigraphy — and certainly more realistic!

]]> http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/05/22/post-cretaceous-weirdness/comment-page-1/#comment-4541 Josh Michaels Sun, 23 May 2010 02:40:43 +0000 http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/?p=1641#comment-4541 of course, you did teach me goods enough not to add a plural noun to the singular word “a(n)”….ah typos…

]]> http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2010/05/22/post-cretaceous-weirdness/comment-page-1/#comment-4540 Josh Michaels Sun, 23 May 2010 02:38:53 +0000 http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/?p=1641#comment-4540 Or the charcoal could be a random unsuspecting tree that got struck by lightning and fell into a stream after burning and had nothing to do with massive firestorms from an asteroids….this would be the pessimistic view of the same stratigraphy. =)

]]>